http://popcornreads.com/ereaders/the-future-of-books-bookstores-publishers-e-books-vs-hard-copy-books/
I found this to be very much in sync with what we discussed in class. I think hardcopy books will have a place, but that ebooks will continue to grow in popularity and eventually become a primary source of reading material.
Heather Dennie-English 30813
Monday, April 22, 2013
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Cartoons
I recently found some comics about ebooks I found to be pretty funny. Enjoy :)

I am having trouble getting the others in an acceptable format for my laptop, but here is the link.
Interview with Connie from Poetry Pals
Heather:
What is Poetry Pals?
Connie:
Poetry Pals is an early literacy program that focuses on helping young children
learn to read.
Heather:
And what ages does it target?
Connie:
Anywhere from 18 months to 5 years old. It just depends on how receptive they
are to it and how eager they are to learn.
Heather:
So how did the program start?
Connie:
Well, it started with Mr. Steve Parks. The stories and poems are the same ones
he told his children. When his children had kids, they insisted he write them
down, and it just took off and the program formed around those same stories.
Heather:
So how exactly does the program work?
Connie:
Well, there is a set of 14 board books, and they all fit into this really cute “Poetree”
stand. The books contain little poems and stories, and each book has a DVD that
goes with it. So the words light up and that way the child can follow along
with the DVD.
Heather:
How have you seen e-readers and the digital revolution affect your program?
Connie:
Well, we still sell books. But we aren’t really able to have bookstores, because people just don’t go to
them much anymore. So instead we sell online and we have some home-based independent
sellers.
Heather:
Do you see e-readers wiping out your program in the near future?
Connie:
No, I don’t. Just because people teach their kids the way they were taught. Who
pulls out their iPad and tells their kid, “Here, let’s read this story?” No
one. People put their children in their laps and point to the words on the
paper page, and help the child sound it out. Then they turn the page together. It’s
just the way it’s always been. I’m sure someday technology will take over, but I
don’t see it coming all that soon.
Heather:
Do you think that books will become “antiques” in the next 20 years?
Connie:
Perhaps. I think children will be one of the bigger markets for actual books in
the future, and in that sense I think our program is safe. But I have an iPad
myself, and in all honesty it is more convenient in many ways. I think that in
the next 50-100 years or so, books will become “collectables,” and people from
your generation will be the ones holding on to your favorite works.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
So When You Google "Funny Pictographs..."
...You get some pretty funny results! Thought I would share! :)
And I have no idea what this actually says, something about clowns. If you know what it says feel free to enlighten me, but I would love to come up with some creative captions for this one!
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Author Interview with Alex Lemon
Heather: Besides teaching and authorship,
what other jobs have you had in the writing field?
Alex: In the writing field, I have
interned with presses, so I’ve worked with presses when I was in graduate
school in the Twin Cities. I’ve run reading series, interacted with authors,
I’ve taught in schools. I’ve volunteered teaching little kids poetry. I’ve done
lots of editing work too. So not only writing and teaching, but everything that
goes on behind the scenes with editing and publishing, and what happens with
post production like tours and selling books. I’ve also dug ditches and
unloaded semis so not just writing books.
Devon: So what motivates you to write when
you sit down?
Alex: I guess it depends on the genre. I
think my impulse for writing is really different depending on if I’m writing
essays or creative nonfiction or poetry. It seems like I really have this kind
of unexplainable urge to create. I feel like poetry is more artistic and
creative in the sense that I can’t always tell you where the impulse comes
from, it’s just something that I really have to do. For writing essays, memoir,
and creative nonfiction I usually have a better idea, I want to tell this story
or I want to write about this topic. And then I kind of go from there. When I’m
writing poetry I have the urge to make something. Often that just means playing
with words and language and there is no direct route.
Heather: What authors and books have
influenced your writing the most?
Alex: We didn’t have a TV when I was
growing up so I was always reading. I read lots of Walt Whitman and Emily
Dickinson but my mom was always just really into me reading. She would get me
whatever books I wanted or take me to the library. More than any specific
author when I was I was young it was about the reading. As I got older I spent
time with the classics and read my way through those. In graduate school I
really felt influenced by people, poets like James Wright, Lorca, and Viejo.
And when it comes to memoir and nonfiction, I was really influenced by nick
Flynn a lot when I was first starting. And new journalism like tom wolf, I’ve
gotten really into. Also Lucy Grealy’s memoir “Autobiography of a Face.” I feel
like that was a really influential text that I go back to often. But I also
feel that I’m just, young as a reader and writer and I still feel like I’m at
this stage where I’m trying to read as much as I can and allow myself to be
influenced, whether its student work or a book that crosses my desk I’m open to
influence. I’m not set in my style yet. I’m trying out a lot of things. One of
the biggest prizes is the Yale series of younger poets and they call you a
“young poet” if you’re up to 45 years old. So I guess I feel like I’m at this
stage where I’m trying out a lot of things.
Heather: So sort of experimenting?
Alex: Yeah! I hope I never lose it, stay
young. It’s kind of cheesy but it’s true.
Heather: So who do you trust most with
editing your work?
Alex: It’s changed as I’ve gotten older.
In school I had a close circle of friends, some I trusted because I admired or
respected the way they wrote. Then as I graduated, I had a professional group
of people that I share my work with. As I’ve gotten older, I’ve just learned to
trust myself more and more and the only person I show my work to before I send
it out to the world is my wife. And sometimes she’s too busy to look at it so I
have to rely on myself. But I usually try to show her.
Heather: Do you rely on her for input or
editing and feedback or what?
Alex: I just want to know what she thinks.
I’m probably just like, “Oh, do you like it? Is it good? Is it terrible? Do you
love it? Do you love me?” you know, it’s more like that. Because I don’t always
agree with what she says and her suggestions. I’m really fortunate that I’ve
had really good editors at all of my presses. My editors haven’t been like,
pedantic and tell me I HAVE to change this. I’ve had editors that have
suggested things or told me what they thought after reading it, and reading
their interaction with the text made me see it in a different way.
Heather: Constructive rather that
destructive?
Alex: Yeah! Totally! And so, it’s helped
me to go back and in a more concrete way decide why and what I do. At this
stage in my life I’m spending more time with my writing and trusting my
instincts more and I show my wife sometimes and then it’s off to a press or a
publisher.
Devon: How would you describe your writing
process?
Alex: I think again this goes back to what
I’m writing. If I’m writing poetry, I often just have….can I show you some? I
have these documents that are notes. Hopefully. And it’s like 60 pages long
now, just ideas and words and sometimes whole parts of poems, sometimes titles,
like if it’s all caps. Here “Custom Love Potions!” ha ha ha. I mean I don’t
know where it comes from or why it’s there when I go back to it, but I have 60
pages of ideas and usually while I read I’m always taking notes or writing
things down and I’ll go back and enter them into my notes. And this is just
with poetry. With poetry the notes are kind of all over, lines, fragments,
something I saw when I was walking. And then the notes for essays are usually much
more structured. Like these are topics. Like monkey mind is something I’m
really interested in. and then there are all these aspects of these topics that
I’m interested in. then a free write and then talking about it in more
neurological way. I guess when it comes to essays it much more planned out or
regimented or outlined. Depending on what I’m going to write for the day, the
night before I’ll decide what I’m going to write and that depends on deadlines.
But if I’m open and I’m not constricted by schedule, ill just follow my notes.
What do I feel like doing? Ill open up the document and see what I have and if
nothing hits the ignition switch I might read a little bit. If I feel like
working on one of those essays, I usually have a pretty good outline. Like oh,
I need to do this research on how the brain factions when the brain is spacing
out. Or usually I have those outlines, and I could spend a couple years just
writing essays because I have so many ideas. I like for the process to be
really organic and not limited. The more constraints I feel, the more I feel
that writing is deadened for me. Time wise, it really depends on...when I was
in graduate school and didn’t have a job, it was great I could write whenever I
wanted. Now I have obligations where I have to teach and grade, which I love!
But it takes a lot of time. And so as I’ve become older I’ve been more grounded
in my profession, I have to dedicate certain days. So on Monday, I don’t
schedule any meetings, I don’t answer my door, I don’t answer my phone, I turn
off my e mail. And I just write. During the school year I try to give myself
one day that way. In the summer I give myself as much as 4 days a week like
that. I mean, it’s kind of cheesy to say “Oh, I would die if I didn’t write!”
but I wouldn’t feel good. I would probably feel physically ill. It’s weird the
way the body and mind interact. I have to write. So usually if I can schedule
one day a week, I am thinking about it and writing things almost every day.
Like that note page is usually open all day. Sometimes I just stare out the
window and think about stuff. The process is very messy.
Heather: Something good comes out of it
though!
Alex: Yeah, something great!
Devon: So how many works have you
published?
Alex: I have published….six books. And I
have two more under contract that have yet to be released. And I have rough
drafts on two big memoirs that offers have been made on. And I turned them down
because they aren’t finished. Individual poems, I don’t know, hundreds and
hundreds of those. And essays, probably close to 50 essays. Most of the poems
in a book, before they make it to a book have been published in literary
journals or an essay might be published in Esquire before it appears in a book.
So yeah, six books and hundreds and hundreds of individual publications.
Heather: So what genres have you published
in?
Alex: I publish poetry, memoir, creative
nonfiction, essays, book reviews. I’ve published sports journalism. I got to
cover the World Series. It was awesome! I got to go to the World Series! I did
have to stay up all night and write a piece that was due the next morning. But
then I also write blurbs for books too, the little things that go on the backs
of books. I guess that’s a kind of genre. Then I present papers, I have a conference
in a month where I am talking about the essay and how it’s changed, I guess
they are nonfiction pieces that are more craft-based and not memoir. And I’ve
written those types of essays about poetry and nonfiction. I’ve written
introductions for people’s books too, just kind of analytical essays about
their work.
Heather: Which genre is your favorite?
Alex: Ahh, I don’t know, I don’t think I
have a favorite! It’s just kind of cool to be able to spend one’s life immersed
in language. But also to be able to create from this mess of language. I mean,
I don’t even have tools. It’s all made up! That’s pretty amazing! I don’t have
to use some kind of material, it all comes from the imagination. Its engagement
with the letters of the alphabet, it just blows my mind!
Heather: 26 little tools?
Alex: Yeah, right? Yeah, I don't know. I
guess it depends on my mood. Right now I’m in a groove of working on these
essays. I’ve been writing a lot, I think since Felix was born, he just turned
two, I’ve probably been writing about him constantly for two years. But that
changes. I might read a book or poem or someone might send me a picture that
makes me want to write art criticism or poems. Again, not feeling limited as to
what I have to do. I’ve entered this really fortunate and kind of bewildering
part of my career where I can kind of do anything I want. And it’s appreciated,
if I do it and spend time on it, it’s going to get published. If I care about
the work and spend time on it, it will get out into the world eventually. And I
think as a young person, that was what everyone was freaked out about. It just
happens, and not having that anxiety is hugely refreshing and invigorating for
my work too.
Devon: How did you find your first
publisher?
Alex: Umm, I think in graduate school,
because professionalization and—for writers—publishing is such, like I said, a
huge point of concern and a topic of discussion. It was always kind of in the
ether. People were either always talking about publishing or, even in a more
codified way, there were panels. So my graduate school brought in, each year, a
panel of people that had published their first book. And they talked about what
it was like and how it happened, and I also went to a graduate school in the
Twin Cities—Minneapolis/St. Paul—and, I think, four of the top five top
publishers were there, located in the area. And so they had really strong
connections to my graduate program, and so I had started publishing some of my
work when I was in graduate school, and I won a really big award—a National
Endowment for the Arts Fellowship—as a graduate student. And I was publishing
in national journals, and so publishers just started to contact me about
books. And, let’s see, I met some
publishers at a conference and they asked if I had a manuscript put together
and I was working on one, finishing it up. And they asked if they could see it,
and so for book publishing, I was really sought after. And that’s not how it
happens usually. I’ve been really, really lucky because usually people struggle;
it’s so hard to publish your work, to find an outlet for it. So in some ways I
kind of followed the path. I built up the small publications—poems, poems,
poems, poems, poems—and then people started to notice them, I was getting some
awards. But then, a lot of young poets submit to contests. There are hundreds
of contests out there. You submit maybe a $25 reading fee and your manuscript,
and then a judge picks the winner, and that’s published. So instead of doing
that, I really avoided all of that mess, and somebody asked for it. I almost am
embarrassed to say it; if I was with writers friends, I would feel really
embarrassed, because some of them have really---like, my mentor in graduate
school told me that he was rejected five-hundred-and-some times, individual
poems. I just can’t imagine how. I was so frail when I started submitting poems
that if that had happened to me, I probably would have just stopped, because a
lot of it is about perseverance and tenacity because at some level it’s
subjective. There’s all of these good poems, and then from those good poems,
somebody in a editorial position picks which one they like best. But at some
level they’re all good.
Heather: What was the first thing you
published?
Alex: As an undergraduate, I published in
a literary magazine, like Eleven 47 here, a poem called The Chanter, I think. And people were really surprised because I
didn’t study any English, I played baseball—I was kind of a meathead. I think
most people thought I was kind of a jock, so they were really surprised. They
were like, “Wait, are you the Alex Lemon that’s writing all these crazy poems?”
I was like, “Yeah man.” So that. But my first official national publication was
a poem called Love is a Very Small
Tsunami in a magazine called the Black Warrior Review that is published by
the University of Alabama, I think. It’s a poem in my first book, and people
started contacting me after that poem was out there.
Devon: How do you feel when you look back
on those early works?
Alex: Well, there are things I would do
differently, but I think any author who says there aren’t things they would
change is a liar. Because you’re a different person every day. You know, I
would write a different poem fifteen minutes from now than I would if I sat
down and wrote it right now. So, I might not like them, they may not be as
interesting to me now as they were then, but they were poems that I really had
to write. They were definitely—like my first memoir is—I had to write about
those things, about a specific topic to get it out of the way. So I’m not
ashamed of them, but I’m also not like, “Look at this awesomeness!” But there’s
things I would change—like when I read at a reading, like next week, I’ll edit
while I go a little bit. Because, like I said, you’re a different person, and
so sometimes I mix it up. And also, I can’t see that well so sometimes when I
get excited my eyes bounce more, and so sometimes when I’m reading they’ll skip
a line, and I’ll be like, “Oh sh--.” But I just keep going.
Heather: So how much do your manuscripts
change through the publishing process?
Alex: It depends. My first book was with
Tin House Books, so my first book of poems, I was working on ten years ago. I
had a whole lot of editorial help. The first draft, it was maybe a hundred pages
long, the second draft was maybe eighty-five, and it ended up being like a
fifty-page book. The same was true for Happy;
the first draft was like 550 pages long, so it shrunk to half that. And
probably more, that manuscript, Happy
changed more drastically than any of my other books because I was new to
writing memoir. I had sold the book on a proposal, so the book was just an idea
when I sold it, and so it wasn’t even written. Of course, when you talk about
it and you want to sell it, you pretend like you know everything—where it’s
going to go. But I didn’t, I actually had to write it and I didn’t know where
it was going to go. I knew the story but I didn’t know how I was going to shape
the story. And until I had—every time I had a conversation with my editor, it
changed the book. That book changed radically, the beginning and the end
changed, what I focused on. In the early drafts, it was more about high school.
But I just turned in a book of poems this Fall; I just got comments on that
manuscript, and the comments are in an email. There wasn’t like what I did with
you guys—like line edits through the entire thing—all the comments were in an
email. I have until March 15th to turn in a book and they’ll publish
it. That’s it. So, no line edits, just really thoughts about order. So really
I’ve done the whole thing from the book changing so much and taking four years
of one-on-one time—that’s how long Happy
took working with an editor back and forth—to this new book—The Wish Book, which comes out next January—it’s
going to change, but because of me not because of any editorial direction.
Devon: How did you see changes in your life
when you started publishing?
Alex: I guess, the more I’ve published, the easier it’s become to publish. More
publishing avenues have opened up to me. My interest in writing journalism and
covering sports and doing things like that have only opened up after I
published Happy or essays or things
like that. So I’ve been asked to do—like I covered the election—I’ve been asked
to do things like that because of a certain literary cache or something.
Notoriety? Those things opened up, but also professionally, like for an English
professor who is a writer, you get better jobs. You have better opportunities; you are a better
candidate. Of course you have to be able to teach and do all those things, but
it looks good for wherever you are, like it looks good for TCU that they have
somebody here who publishes a bunch and gets awards and stuff like that. So
those kind of things have changed, I’ve been asked to do a lot more readings,
I’ve become busier. It’s really funny, I have more opportunities to publish and
I have more opportunities to do fun and cool stuff, but I have less time to
write than ever. The one thing that I really want, more time to write, is the
one thing that seems to be dwindling as I publish more and more. I’m not sure,
maybe at some level that changes again.
Devon: Maybe it’s something you have to
change, like have two days a week to write instead of one.
Heather: Your phone goes off more.
Alex: Yeah, I think I’m getting to this
point where I really have to check in with a lot of those rules I’ve made for
myself. Like instead of just having one day, I need to be really overprotective.
Maybe it’s two days. And I’m moving to this different area in my career where
more lifetime fellowships and grants are opening up to me. And if and when I
get those, they would give me time—I would take a year or two off of teaching
and just work. So it’s always in flux, always a little bit of this, a little
bit of that.
Heather: So how do you see authorship and
readership changing in the next 50 or so years?
Alex: 50? This is something that I’ve
talked about at conferences and that a lot of my friends and I talk about. I
think there will always be artisanal small press publishing for poetry books.
Nobody that publishes poetry makes a ton of money publishing poetry. They do it
because they love literature, they do it because they love books. Most of the
really good poetry publishers are non-profit, so they’re not interested in
making a ton of money. I think those people that buy those books and read those
books will always want to have books—like tangible. Just like art books or
McSweeny’s Press. They publish cool-looking books, and they do wacky stuff all
the time. I think there’s always going to be an element of publishing like
that, so that there will be photography books, there will be art books, there
will be poetry books. But at the same time, as technology makes it more and
more available, they’re also going to publish eBooks on digital platforms, you
know, all of my poetry books are now available on eBooks or iBooks, things like
that—because it’s gotten really easy for them to transfer, to do both. So I
don’t think it’s going to influence these small non-profit presses as much—the
poetry ones. I think presses that publish prose more and more are going to have
to rely on digital sales, because eventually most people are going to be
reading digitally just because of its ease of access, you don’t have to carry
books around—
Heather: It’s cheaper.
Alex: Yeah, it’s cheaper that all of your
books are going to be on eReaders or iBooks or whatever. And so, I think, books
like Happy, they will print fewer and
fewer hardcopies, and more sales will go to digital publishing. And more and
more big house publishing is going to have to go the way of digital publishing.
I sold Happy on a proposal and that
was right before the kind of sea-change into digital publishing. My agent just
took this offer for another memoir that’s partial again, it was a rough draft,
and they offered an amount that wasn’t as much. And my agent and I talked, and
that has to do with just the changes in publishing. They are seeing a market
drop-off in how may hardcopies they sell, and that’s going to change for
writers like me—well, I also don’t fit in because I’m a professor and my living
comes from being a professor—but for writers like me, as opposed to Steven
King—Steven King is always going to make a ton of money, no matter what. But
for people that are mid-list and lower on the list, they’re going to make less
and less money as a writer with big house publishing because of that. And maybe
once it’s all figured out some of those things will change. Technology’s been
pretty cool because it’s also opened up a lot of opportunities for publishing
too. There are more presses than ever, and people are pressing, even if they
have a small Indie press, they’re publishing good books, and they can be
beautiful books. But technology hasn’t been figured out for people like me, but
it has made for more work. They want you to blog, and they want you to have a
Facebook page, and they want you to have a Twitter account. So you spend all of
this time with promotion that they want you to do instead of writing. Again,
it’s like another way that you constantly write now.
Devon: Do you see any ways that it’s going
to change your writing and your audience as it gets more digital?
Alex: I mean, because of technology, my
audience has grown. There are just more avenues to disseminate whatever your
product is—I hate to say writing is a product, but it is—with social networking
and Twitter and that kind of stuff, more people are going to read by books than
if they just sat in a library and there was no way to get them out there. So, more
people are going to have the opportunity to read the books. I don’t think it’s
going to change the way I write. I know some people are really interested in
new media digital creation and all I want to say about that is that I’m not
interested in it. Because there are people in English departments who, that’s
what they spend their time doing. Nope—not my thing.
Devon: Our last question is, how do you feel
about self-publishing?
Alex: I really don’t know. I guess I’ve
been brought up in this culture to be really dismissive of self-publishing
because I do feel like the gatekeepers—like the editors and publishers—they do
have an influence in quality. And so, I’m all for self-publishing, if people
could just disseminate their stuff, but I would want it to be good somehow. How
do you force yourself to wait until the product is good? I would be for
self-publishing if so much of self-publishing wasn’t terrible. Somehow it needs
to be vetted, and how do you vet yourself? But I think self-publishing is
exciting because it’s broken the constraints of publishing. So that idea, that
there’s this sort of free market is really cool, but it’s also really disheartening
to see how much of what people want to published shouldn’t be published. Does
that make sense?
Devon: And also it’s the idea of where it
came from, having an extra set of eyes on your work.
Alex: Yeah, for sure and so there is some
sort of cache that comes with publishing houses or whatever, but also it just
makes the work inherently better.
Heather: So much of it gets out there
unpolished, before it’s ready.
Alex: Yeah, and I think that’s something
that so very few people can do themselves, just to solely rely on themselves to
work something until it’s good. Until that can somehow happen, 99% of
self-publishing is just going to be terrible. And then it’s going to be a shame
for that 1% because it’s going to get thrown in—“oh, it’s self published.” But
I’m sure some of it’s good, it just gets washed away with how people dismiss
the rest of it for being self-published.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




